By Ken Parks, January 5, 2013
After more than
40 years, I remember the way things used to be. My Dad had instilled
in me that Germans made the best photographic camera equipment and
the Japanese were inferior. My Dad was more of a gadget guy than
photographic artist with bias toward the German's superior technology
and design. He taught me all the intricate and technical aspects of
photography, but he was weak in the areas of composition, lighting,
and theme.
This is an early morning shot taken in Florence Italy of the Giotti Tower and the Duamo. My photographic endeavors have taken me to Italy and several areas of the U.S. and Canada Although, I have no formal training or degree in the arts or photography, I have learned and graduated from the university of hard knocks.
My first 35mm
camera was a Voigtlander Bessamatic. My Dad and I had visited his
favorite stomping grounds, Groton Camera, a store in the Groton Long
Point shopping mall. And it was business as usual – buy some film
and chat with the owner. I was on the opposite side of the store and
noticed my Dad was eyeing a German camera under the glass counter.
I paid no attention as he and the owner talked and handled the newly
discovered camera.
In
my formal years of learning photography with my Voigtlander Bessamatic,
my Dad and I used to peruse through the Popular Photography magazine
and Modern Photography. My Dad always had his eye on the Hasselblad 500
C/M. But in those days, early 1970's, the model with a standard 80mm
lens, one backpack, and a waistline viewer cost about the same as an
average new car. Ironically, the Hasselblad that I purchased was made the same year as when my Dad passed away.
He called me
over. And then the conversation centered on the purchase of this
camera. Being 15 years old and having very little money, the
likelihood that I would have my own camera was slim to none. Then
the questioned was posed, “Would you like to see it?” With the
camera in hand, I was winding the unloaded camera and releasing the
shutter. I was impressed in the solid metal construction and weight
of the camera. But, I did not want to get my hopes up.
My Dad asked,
“How much is it?” At first I was surprised that he was going to
buy it. When the response was $65.00, I knew there was little hope.
My Dad could not afford it. This was equivalent to $650.00 in
today's economy. My Dad placed $10.00 on the counter and asked, “Can
you put it on lay-away?” Then he turned to me and said, “You'll
have to save up and pay for it, then the camera is yours.” I was
surprised that he had placed enough confidence in me and that I would
be determined to go through with the purchase.”
Wedding photography is my forte. One of my recent weddings was done at a fantastic venue, and the bride & groom were wonderful. Everyone had a great time, and this was one of my best shoots.
I was determined
to keep my word, to work toward the goal of owning this camera. It
was my first major expense and I had to find a way to make the weekly
payments. I set up an enterprise of lawn care and mowing lawns. The
subdivision that we resided, Fieldcrest, had about 200 homes. I had
canvassed the subdivision and the immediate area, and I was able to
land several weekly customers. It was a long and arduous Summer. No
sooner had I received $5 for mowing someone's yard, I made a payment
to Groton Camera. When the new school year started, I was the proud
owner of a Voigtlander Bessamatic.
My Dad had
bought two Voigtlander Ultramatics and we shared the lenses. He also
found out that the Retina Reflex lens mounts could be modified to fit
both our cameras. I learned how to develop film and produce prints in
our home darkroom. I shot for the school newspaper and the yearbook.
I sold photographs to realtors. For the next three years, I was his
protege. When he passed away, I lost my photographic mentor. There
was no local photography clubs and David Genders, my 9th
grade teacher and yearbook counselor, had moved to California. My
Dad left behind his articles that he wrote for the Sub-Base newspaper
and the Time-Life Photography book set.
I included photography during my studies at Thames Valley. In a manner of speaking I was considered a professional photographer after the approval went through as a paying position at the college.
It was not until
I went to college that I felt that my photographic endeavors could be
used for the college yearbook. The first year I was disappointed.
The photographic editor was disorganized and ignored my abilities.
It was apparent that his photos were the primary selections and that
this was “his” yearbook. The following year, I was chosen to be
photographic editor. I organized our shoots, assigned my team of
photographers to events, and selected Steve Bovia, a longtime
classmate, to be the darkroom organizer. I was both a manager and
photographer. Chamberlain made my position a paying job with the
state of Connecticut. I set up parameters as to the quality of photos
and the yearbook was the best ever produced.
During my
college years, I made a dramatic change. The time had come. I had
bought into a Japanese camera system. This was against anything my
Dad had wanted. All of his cameras were German. There was the Speed
Graphics with Linhoff lens, the Rolleiflex, the Voigtlanders, and the
Braun flash units... nothing Japanese.
It was my habit of having a camera with me most of the time. The reason - you never know. This was a photograph of a dancer preparing for her tryout in Orlando, Florida. I used a 1200mm lens on a Olympus digital camera.
Times were
changing. Time and Life magazines had replaced all the their Nikons
with the Olympus system. It was smaller, weighed less, and produced
the same quality of photographs. After reading the reviews, I was
hooked, and had my eyes were set on an Olympus OM-2 and a Vivitar
Series 1 zoom lens.
The check from
Social Security had come in, and I was able to pay off the Mustang II
and had more than enough for the purchase of the OM-2 and a few
lenses. Instead of the standard 50mm f/1.8 lens, I ordered one of
Olympus best lens, the Zuiko 55mm, f/1.2 lens. It was one of the
fastest lenses available in the 35mm market.
For the next 30
years, this was my primary camera. I had built up the system to
include another OM-2 body, motor drives, and several lenses. Yes, I
still have the Voigtlander Bessamatic and a few lenses, my pride and
joy.
This is one of the first film photography images in more than 10 years. My last film photography was during my Italy trip in 2002.
After 10 yeas of
shooting only digital, I recently started to shoot film again. I had
to dust off the Voigtlander, the OM-2's and the medium format
cameras. This included the Hasselblad 500 C/M, the Rolleiflex 2.8C,
and the Bronica ETRSi. The Epson V600 scanner was finally installed
after sitting in the box for nearly 3 years. I had put it off for
several years until Joe Hoyle, a local photography friend
re-introduced film photography. We performed a shoot at Southeastern
Railway Museum. We had a blast. Afterwords, we met again at the
Camera Doctor store where the film was processed.
I reflect back
to the yesteryear when my Dad and I photographed weddings. Had he
not a short life (died 51 years old), he would not have approved of
my Japanese camera purchase. But, I was driven by the changes in the
photographic industry. Today, I still have in possession both German
and Japanese cameras. The photographic industry continues to evolve.
The Canon EOS 7D is my professional DSLR system.
Ken Parks is the owner and senior photographer at WeddingsThruTheLens.com
No comments:
Post a Comment